The bin­ding

When a child is new to a day care cen­ter, they lea­ve the clo­se cir­cle of the family.

For many child­ren it is usual­ly the first time that they lea­ve this cir­cle and they behave inse­cu­re­ly and some­ti­mes also anxious­ly in the new situa­ti­on. In the tran­si­ti­on pha­se, it is very important for the child to build a rela­ti­on­ship with the edu­ca­tor. When the child feels secu­re, he or she is hap­py to go on dis­co­very tours and gets to know the other child­ren and the new envi­ron­ment with gre­at interest.

Through the sen­si­ti­ve beha­vi­or of the edu­ca­tor, we pro­mo­te a posi­ti­ve bon­ding expe­ri­ence for the child. The more sen­si­tively we react to the child­ren’s needs, the bet­ter the bond can deve­lop, becau­se the child feels taken serious­ly and reco­gni­zes a relia­bi­li­ty. It is very important for the child that we react con­stant­ly and appro­pria­te­ly to the signals sent.

The dif­fe­rent types of bin­dings and how they can be distinguished

  • Type A: the unsafe avo­i­ding binding

The child­ren are not rest­ric­ted in their joy of dis­co­very and do not chan­ge their beha­vi­or when the care­gi­ver lea­ves the room. From this we often con­clude that the child shows a sta­ble per­so­na­li­ty. This is mista­ken. For the most part, we reco­gni­ze at a later point in time that the child keeps its needs to its­elf, becau­se it has too often made the expe­ri­ence that the par­ents have not respon­ded to its needs enough. This can be seen in the fact that the child can deal bad­ly with fru­stra­ti­on and nega­ti­ve emotions.

  • Type B: the secu­re binding

As soon as the refe­rence per­son wants to lea­ve the room, the child reacts with pro­test, such as cry­ing or screa­ming and is hard­ly com­for­ted by the edu­ca­tors. As soon as the mother is back, the child can be quick­ly cal­med down and imme­dia­te­ly devo­tes hers­elf again to dis­co­ve­ring and play­ing. The child­ren expe­ri­ence that their needs are taken serious­ly. They have built trust in their refe­rence per­sons and the envi­ron­ment and are also making good new contacts.

  • Type C: the unsafe ambi­va­lent bond

The­se child­ren show litt­le joy of dis­co­very even in the pre­sence of their par­ents. They cling to their par­ents and are hard­ly inte­re­sted in the envi­ron­ment. They seem anxious, inse­cu­re and reser­ved. The child­ren have usual­ly expe­ri­en­ced very con­tra­dic­to­ry reac­tions to their needs and do not feel safe.

  • Type D: the inse­cu­re dis­or­ga­ni­zed binding

The child­ren react very con­tra­dic­to­ri­ly to the sepa­ra­ti­on of their refe­rence per­sons, e.g. with aggres­si­ve­ness, anger, cram­ping of the body, etc. The child­ren may have expe­ri­en­ced trau­ma or distress in the past, which has led to a bon­ding disorder.

Serai­na Krebs, Co-edu­ca­tor, Kita Zug

Pho­to by Caro­li­ne Her­nan­dez on Uns­plash

Weitere Beiträge

The dyna­mic self-image

«I haven’t fai­led. I have only found 10000 ways that don’t work.» Tho­mas A. Edi­son How we see our­sel­ves signi­fi­cant­ly influen­ces our actions. Alt­hough a per­son’s

Das dyna­mi­sche Selbstbild

«Ich habe nicht ver­sagt. Ich habe nur 10000 Wege gefun­den, die nicht funk­tio­nie­ren.» Tho­mas A. Edi­son Wie wir uns sel­ber sehen, beein­flusst unser Han­deln massgeblich.