«I haven’t fai­led. I have only found 10000 ways that don’t work.»

Tho­mas A. Edison

How we see our­sel­ves signi­fi­cant­ly influ­en­ces our actions. Alt­hough a person’s self-image may not necessa­ri­ly be true, it is power­ful enough to have far-rea­ching con­se­quen­ces in reality.

The self-image is the idea one has of oneself — it is based on self-per­cep­ti­on. This idea is not sim­ply given to you, but you make it, you crea­te it. More pre­cise­ly, our self-image refers to the inter­play of the expe­ri­en­ces we have alrea­dy had, but also to memo­ries, thoughts and fee­lings. In this sen­se, this made iden­ti­ty also con­tains a gre­at poten­ti­al to deal with (fail­u­re) suc­cess & mista­kes in a healt­hy way — it espe­cial­ly influ­en­ces the moti­va­ti­on of a per­son and also the indi­vi­du­al per­so­nal lear­ning development.

In rese­arch, Carol Dweck was the first to rai­se inte­rest in this poten­ti­al by coi­ning the term dyna­mic growth mind­set. A per­son with a growth mind­set under­stands that skills and abi­li­ties can be acqui­red fun­da­ment­al­ly through effort, per­si­stence, and dili­gence, and cul­ti­va­tes the­se same beha­viou­ral con­cepts — whe­re­as indi­vi­du­als with a fixed mind­set tend to belie­ve that their intel­li­gence and talents are fixed, unch­an­ge­ab­le traits.

The belief that “I can acqui­re any skill, pro­vi­ded I make an effort to do so” is also a cen­tral point in edu­ca­tio­nal moti­va­ti­on not only at the pri­ma­ry and lower levels, but also later in the edu­ca­tio­nal care­er of a child or a young adult. Edu­ca­ti­on aims not only to pro­vi­de the child with know­ledge that can be use­ful in later life and the world of work, but also seeks to edu­ca­te the child to beco­me an inde­pen­dent and self-regu­la­ting per­son. Of cour­se, this also inclu­des a healt­hy, dyna­mic self-image as well as an awa­reness of one’s own self-effi­cacy, which is ide­al­ly pro­mo­ted and streng­t­he­ned by a sen­se of achie­ve­ment during child­hood and later school years.

Nevertheless, it must also be men­tio­ned at this point that the abo­ve-men­tio­ned belief system is based on an idea­li­zed con­cep­ti­on, just as the self-image is mea­su­red against an ide­al image. The pro­blem with such an ide­al is that it never inclu­des all con­di­ti­ons: Tho­se who work hard will not always necessa­ri­ly succeed.

Inde­ed, a signi­fi­cant fac­tor in the for­ma­ti­on of the self-image is also the inter­pre­ta­ti­on and design of the tea­ching (or the cir­cum­stan­ces of life) and the reac­tions from the envi­ron­ment. Tho­se who are con­stant­ly dis­cou­ra­ged or unre­spon­si­ve to inst­ruc­tio­n­al design are less likely to have a sen­se of accom­plish­ment and thus less likely to belie­ve in their own self-efficacy.

This is not to say that tea­chers and par­ents should shy away from giving the child feed­back on his or her beha­viour, it is more about how it is com­mu­ni­ca­ted to the child. «You did­n’t do so well on the math assign­ments today» is more con­struc­ti­ve feed­back than say­ing «You are very bad at math». The lat­ter con­veys the child that he or she is fun­da­ment­al­ly bad at math, and offers him or her cau­se to adopt this way of thin­king as an inner atti­tu­de toward hims­elf or herself — whe­re­as the first feed­back is aimed less at the child’s iden­ti­ty than at the action he or she has performed.

As an adult, you know this all too well: some days, unfor­tu­n­a­te­ly, the things you set out to do don’t turn out so well — but that does­n’t mean it has to be that way fore­ver or that you should sur­ren­der to a fate. Rather, you find in it the chan­ce to belie­ve in yours­elf and to moti­va­te yours­elf to grow beyond self-impo­sed limits and to get to know new sides of yours­elf, becau­se — as alrea­dy men­tio­ned at the begin­ning — the image we have of our­sel­ves does not always cor­re­spond to the per­son we real­ly are.

Kin­der­gar­ten Ennetbaden

Pho­to by Anna Kolo­sy­uk on Unsplash